During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
For multiple readers
。业内人士推荐同城约会作为进阶阅读
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36
舉例來說，汽車產業一直是中德關係的核心支柱，貢獻德國對中國出口的近三分之一。但近年中國汽車業崛起，根據榮鼎集團數據，2025年德國汽車對華出口暴跌66%至2009年最低，中國電動車品牌如比亞迪、蔚來在歐洲市場份額則從2020年的不足1%躍升至2025年的12%。